Making a separation between these setting exams and people educating them might assist protect the integrity of public exams, says a lecturers’ chief.
Malcolm Trobe, of the ASCL heads’ union, mentioned senior examiners might be barred from making ready pupils for exams from the board for which they work.
It comes after allegations over examination leaks led to workers suspensions on the main Eton and Winchester faculties.
In each instances the lecturers additionally labored as senior examiners for an examination board.
The problem was highlighted by the Each day Telegraph, which revealed Eton School had dismissed its head of economics and deputy head of teachers, Mo Tanweer, following allegations that he had shared confidential details about a forthcoming economics examination with different members of workers.
The newspaper additionally reported that Winchester School had suspended its head of artwork historical past amid related accusations, this time alleged to contain pupils being given “advance data” of two examination papers.
In each instances, the exams in query have been a Cambridge Worldwide Pre-U, predominantly taken by non-public college pupils as an alternative choice to A-levels.
And in each instances, the pupils usually are not being penalised; as an alternative marks for the exams will probably be estimated utilizing coursework and/or different papers.
Senior examiners are chargeable for setting examination questions, whereas chief examiners are chargeable for the entire examination syllabus for examination boards.
They’re consultants of their topics and work in state colleges in addition to non-public colleges.
‘Tradition of ethics’
Mr Trobe, the deputy common secretary of the Affiliation of College and School leaders, labored as a senior examiner for a few years.
He mentioned individuals who taught on the degree at which pupils have been being examined have been “far and away probably the most applicable folks to be setting examinations in these topics”.
The place teachers had set exams, there had been points about getting the extent and wording of the questions proper, he defined.
“It’s a complicated space that must be checked out, however it does come again to examiners having a robust tradition of ethics to make sure that they don’t benefit the pupils that they train in any manner.”
He added: “It might be checked out – we might provide you with a system the place a senior examiner who units the examination for a board just isn’t allowed to show that board in a faculty.
“There will probably be senior workers in state colleges who set papers as there are in non-public colleges, however we’re speaking a couple of small variety of folks.”
He recommended the issue highlighted by the Each day Telegraph tales might doubtlessly contain a small variety of colleges, as not more than 10 folks per examination paper would have content material data
However the chairman of the Headmasters’ and Headmistresses’ Convention, Chris King, acknowledged that extra lecturers who labored as examiners could but turn out to be concerned.
He instructed the Each day Telegraph it was right down to examination boards to stop conflicts of curiosity.
Mr King, who represents main non-public colleges, mentioned the problem had involved head lecturers for a while.
An pressing assembly with examination boards taking a look at whether or not “adequate safeguards are in place” is being introduced ahead.
“We have to be certain that senior lecturers who tackle the accountability for setting exams usually are not positioned in an unattainable place, and the only a few who could also be tempted to offer their pupils an excessive amount of assist can’t accomplish that,” Mr King mentioned.
Eton School mentioned the issues it had confronted with the examination have been “extraordinarily unwelcome” and had been taken “very significantly”.
Winchester School mentioned in an announcement that it had handled this matter with the “utmost seriousness”, and had labored carefully with the Examination Board all through.
“It significantly regrets what has occurred. No boy was in charge for the examination irregularity.”
A spokesman for Cambridge Worldwide Examinations mentioned: “Defending the integrity of our exams is our precedence and we take very significantly our duties to make sure that all our examinations are truthful, and that every one college students obtain an applicable and legitimate grade.”
The Division for Training mentioned: “Dad and mom and college students should be capable of think about the examination system. Any suggestion of malpractice is regarding and must be regarded into.
“Cambridge Worldwide Examinations board are coping with the incidents and have made the examination regulator Ofqual conscious.”
Revealed at Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:36:12 +0000