Calls to make it unlawful for firms to inform girls to put on excessive heels at work have been rejected by the federal government.
The Equalities Workplace mentioned it might as a substitute introduce tips for corporations on office gown codes this summer season.
It mentioned firms ought to assess whether or not their guidelines are “related and lawful”.
The problem was debated in Parliament in March after Nicola Thorp, who was despatched house for carrying flat footwear, arrange a petition with extra 152,000 signatures.
Miss Thorp started the petition after being informed to depart a temp job for refusing to put on a “2-4in heel”.
A subsequent parliamentary investigation into heels and company dress codes discovered “widespread discrimination” in workplaces.
The Petitions Committee and Ladies and Equalities Committee revealed its findings in January, observing that “doubtlessly discriminatory gown codes are commonplace”.
On Friday, the federal government mentioned the legislation was “ample” in a formal response to the petition and investigation.
“However we recognise that some employers lack consciousness of the legislation and even select to flout it,” the federal government mentioned.
It added: “The Authorities Equalities Workplace will likely be producing steerage on gown codes within the office as a selected response to the Thorp petition and the problems it raises.”
Miss Thorp, who’s an equality campaigner from London, merely tweeted: “The Authorities believes that present legislature is ‘ample’.”
Maria Miller, who chairs the Ladies and Equalities Committee, mentioned she welcomed the choice to introduce new tips.
“This petition, and the committees’ inquiry, have bolstered the necessity for efficient enforcement of laws and for employers and workers to pay attention to their obligations and rights,” she mentioned.
“We welcome the commitments made by the federal government to rising consciousness of these rights.”
Ms Miller mentioned she hoped the subsequent authorities, which will be voted in at the election on 8 June, would “monitor how this adjustments girls’s experiences of the office”.
Helen Jones, who chairs the Petitions Committee, added that Miss Thorp’s petition and the resultant investigation had completed a “nice deal” to lift consciousness.
“The federal government has accepted our suggestion that it must be doing rather more to enhance understanding amongst employers and workers alike, to forestall discriminatory practices within the office,” she mentioned.