The brand new laptop science GCSE has been thrown into disarray after programming duties value a fifth of the whole marks have been leaked repeatedly on-line.
Exams regulator Ofqual plans to drag this chunk of the qualification from the general marks because it has been seen by 1000’s of individuals.
Ofqual stated the non-exam evaluation might have been leaked by lecturers in addition to college students who had accomplished the duty.
The breach impacts two 12 months teams. The primary will sit the examination in summer time 2018.
Final 12 months 70,000 college students have been entered for laptop science GCSE.
A fast web search reveals quite a few posts concerning the the non-exam evaluation, with questions and potential solutions.
There are even posts from one of many examination boards reminding college students that they’re monitoring sure web sites.
An announcement from the regulator stated: “Non-exam evaluation in laptop science is meant to check college students’ programming expertise and is value 20% of the general 9 to at least one grade.
“Nevertheless, there may be proof that a few of this 12 months’s duties have been posted to on-line boards and collaborative programming websites, opposite to examination board guidelines.
“Detailed options have been supplied in lots of instances, and a few of these posts have been seen 1000’s of instances.”
That is towards the foundations and modifications could be wanted so grades may very well be awarded pretty subsequent summer time, Ofqual added.
The regulator is working a brief session on learn how to proceed.
Its most well-liked possibility would maintain the non-exam evaluation job, however to vary it so it now not contributes to the general mark.
Julie Swan, government director for basic , stated: “It’s with nice reluctance that we’re proposing to vary a qualification for which college students are already learning.
“Nevertheless, we should take rapid motion to deal with these points and the potential impression on public confidence in relation to this qualification.
“Topic to the session responses, we consider our most well-liked answer will ship fairer and extra dependable outcomes than would in any other case be the case.
“It would additionally enable us to be assured that requirements can be set appropriately.”
Geoff Barton, of the Affiliation of College and School Leaders, stated the integrity of the evaluation had been compromised by the “widespread availability of options on-line”.
He added that of all the themes, laptop science was the one the place college students have been more than likely to pay attention to “on-line alternatives”.
“It’s an enormously irritating state of affairs for all involved however we recognise that Ofqual has no possibility aside from to seek the advice of on different preparations,” he stated.
He added that different choices could be wanted in the long run as “the ubiquity of on-line info” made this type of evaluation extraordinarily susceptible.
Revealed at Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:00:32 +000zero